Thursday, May 30, 2013

Tinerciler bitti, sıra ayyaşlara geldi


Geçtiğimiz yıl “Dindar olmasınlar da tinerci mi olsunlar” çıkışıyla laik bir devletin başbakanı olarak sarfettiği “Dindar nesil yetiştirmek istiyoruz” sözlerini savunan Erdoğan, bu yıl da şaşırtmıyor. Bu kez kafası kıyak bir nesil istemediklerini belirten Başbakan, 28 Mayıs 2013 tarihinde partisinin grup toplantısında yaptığı konuşmada “Milyonlarca Fatih yetiştirmek istiyoruz” diyerek nasıl bir dindarlık istediğini de netleştirmiş oldu.

Başbakan, alkol düzenlemesiyle ilgili olarak “Bunu birçok yere çekenler olabilir. Bunu inancı nedeniyle yapıyor, İslam böyle emrettiği için yapıyor diye. Hangi din olursa olsun, bir din yanlışı değil doğruyu emrediyor.” şeklindeki açıklamasında din ne söylerse doğrudur kabulüyle, hayatlarımıza dair meseleler üzerine tartışmaları akıl ve mantık çerçevesinde yürütmenin önünü tıkamakta, tüm dinlerin de alkole eşit mesafede durmadığını unutarak bu tartışmaları dini referanslarla sürdürmenin imkansızlığını en başta kendi cümlelerindeki tutarsızlıkla göstermektedir.

Başbakan “Din doğruyu emrediyor diye karşısında mı duracaksınız. İki tane ayyaşın yaptığı yasa sizin için muteber oluyor da inancın emrettiği bir gerçek niçin sizler için reddedilmesi gerek bir olay haline geliyor?” diye soruyor. Evet, laik bir devlette yürürlüğe sokulmak istenen bir uygulamanın dini gerekçelere dayandırılması kabul edilemez. Başbakanın bu beyanatları açıkça, bu ülkenin yasalarının dini emirlere dayandırılmasının karşısında hiçbir engel tanımadığının bir ifadesidir. AKP kurmayları olsun, kimi basın kuruluşları olsun, bu düzenlemeleri Avrupa’daki örneklerine atıfta bulunarak savunup kamuoyunu sağlık gerekçelerini öne sürerek iknaya çalışırlarken, Başbakanın çok rahat bir şekilde, son derece kendine güvenerek ‘velev ki dini sebeplerle’ deyivermesi Türkiye’deki şeriatçı eğilim ve uygulamaların geldiği vahim noktayı göstermektedir.

Bizler Özgür Düşünce Hareketi olarak toplumsal yaşamın dinselleştirilmesine; dinsel yaşam biçiminin zorla ya da bu yaşam biçimini zorunlu kılacak düzenlemelerle insanlara dayatılmasına karşıyız. Avrupa benzeri medeni, eşitlikçi ve demokratik yaşam standartlarını getirme iddiasındaki AKP hükümetinin politikalarındaki amaç, konu özgür düşünce, eşcinsel hakları, kadın hakları, seçim barajı ve çevre sorunlarına geldiğinde daha görünür bir hal almaktadır. Genç nesillerine iyi bir eğitim, sağlık, iş, barınma imkanı, onurlu bir yaşam ve güvenli bir gelecek sunamayan bu devletin ayrımcı söylemlerinin de baskıcı yasalarının da karşısındayız!

Özgür Düşünce Hareketi, Mayıs 2013

Thursday, May 16, 2013

A "Street" Guide for Protesters


The following text is a free translation of “Bir Eylemci İçin Sokak Rehberi” published anonymously in Fraksiyon on April 30th, 2012. It is aimed at providing a list of suggestions for protesters.


  • Never forget that the state uses psychological violence for preventing you from going to the street. Trust your companions and feel your legitimate actions.
  • Have a small action committee. Try to stick together as much as you can. Keep communication channels open.
  • Beware provocations. Even a few motivated people can become natural leaders of a mass demonstrations. Come up with ideas to maintain the action, and let your creativity flow.
  • The strongest side of an action is its unpredictability. Do not act according to how the state would predict.
  • Spread the action. Tell by-walkers about the action and expose state violence.
  • Be careful with your reactions towards objects that are not directly state's tools of violence or symbols thereof. Choose your targets wisely so that those who do not take part do not get confused about your acts.
  • Put sneakers on in order to facilitate running.
  • Put on clothes that would cover most part of your skin in order to protect yourself from sun and teargas. Light raincoats recommended.
  • Get eye protection. Take care that it is resistant to cracking. Sunglasses, goggles or gas masks recommended.
  • Have gas masks or a scarf and eyeglasses.
  • Take light extra clothes. (in case of yours get wet, painted etc.)
  • A hat or a helmet for protection from sunlight and from chemicals.
  • In case of direct contact with any kind of chemicals, never put on petroleum jelly, mineral oil, oil-based suncream or moisturizer. Only if it is summer time and you will be exposed to direct sunlight for a long time, put a little bit of suncream (even if it is oil-based), because teargas on sunburned areas hurts a lot.
  • Never have contact lenses on.


How to protect yourself



  • Apple vinegar is one of the simplest ways for breathing. You can prepare scarfs submersed into apple vinegar and keep them in your bag. In case of teargas attacks, cover your mouth and nose tightly with the scarf. If you don't have apple vinegar, lemon juice can be used.
  • In case of a teargas attack, try to climb up the hill as much as you can, and never kneel down even if you are exhausted.
  • When exposed to teargas, clean your nose, gargle, cough and spit, try not to swallow it.
  • Never rub your eyes.
  • You can prepare a baking soda for your skin and carry it with you. (around 5% baking powder in water) When exposed to teargas, you can treat your skin with the soda to neutralize the chemicals.
  • Another method for your skin is to scrub it with alcohol (pay special attention to keep alcohol away from your eyes) and then put canola oil. To do this, get a sponge, immerse the oil in the sponge and apply it to the parts exposed to teargas.
  • To clean your eyes from chemicals, you can use milk. Take half a teacup of milk, tilt your head backwards, drop a little bit of the milk to clean your eyes.
  • Spread your arms wide, make movements.
  • Take off all the clothes with teargas and wash them with detergent. If you cannot wash them immediately, take them off, put them in a plastic bag, and leave them outdoors (such as in your balcony).
  • If you cannot go home right after being exposed to teargas, get rid off your clothes as soon as possible (including underwear). Carrying extra clothes recommended.
  • Take a cold shower. Before taking the shower, pay attention not to touch your eyes, your face, people around you or even the objects in your house. Wait five minutes under cold shower without using soap or without rubbing your skin. Only after the cold shower, use mild water and soap. Do not take a bath.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Turkey's 9/11 : Reyhanlı


Editor's note: This is a compilation of news items and articles originally published in Turkish. With the exception of the introduction, we do not claim any intellectual nor political credit for the text. All the analyses belong to the authors of the texts referred to at the end of each paragraph. Yet, the mistakes and misinterpretations are due to our misunderstanding of the analyses.
Please read our previous news item on the subject and check the Syria label for further comments.

On Saturday, May 11th, two car explosions were reported in Reyhanlı, Turkey. The first numbers were 4 dead and 20 injuries. The number of deaths later increased to 8, then to 22, and then to 46, and then came the media blackout issued by the government, prohibiting any kind of journalist activities on the matter. In general, such big events cannot be analyzed without a big margin of error due to macro-political secrecies, but this time we do not even know how many citizens lost their lives. There is a widespread rumor, claimed to be reported by local hospitals, that the actual number is 177 deaths, and as for injuries hundred seems to be the significant digit.



This news item aims at separating evidence-based factual information from speculative analysis. This is not to underrate political analysis in any way. Due to media blackout accompanied with auto-censorship in mainstream media, it became especially difficult to reach proper information on the matter. Therefore, we have had hard time preparing a well-designed analysis.


Facts and observations

After the explosions, government officials pointed the Assad regime and so did the media. Vice prime minister Beşir Atalay claimed that the investigations concluded that Al Muhaberat, an organization allied with the Syrian government forces, is responsible for the attacks. Minister of Internal Affairs Muammer Güler confirmed Atalay's statement.[1] On Sunday, 10 people were arrested for investigations. The authorities did not let anyone enter the crime scene, including parliamentarians of the opposition parties. A deputy reported that the excuse was that they were collecting evidence, yet what the deputies observed was that the police was destroying evidence with heavy construction equipment. [2]


The locals are outraged due to the complete indifference in media, as almost all TV channels continued showing their prime time programs, ranging from sitcoms to reality shows. One local, when noticed the camera of a BBC journalist after a funeral, complained “What are you doing? We warned you hundreds of times before, you ignored it. Look, I am an enemy of this state. Let them put me in jail, I hope they do.” Another one reacted “So many people died, no one is sharing our sorrow. TV channels are shouting at us with their entertainment shows. What kind of mourning is this?” [3]

The National Intelligence Service (MİT) claimed that the bombs were loaded in Ar-Raqqah, Syria. This does not seem plausible due to the followings: Since March, Ar-Raqqah is under control of the Al Nusra Front, an organization affiliated to Al Qaida. It is a town that is 300 km away from the Yayladağı border gate, which MİT claimed the cars crossed the border. The area is strictly controlled both by the Syrian state and by the rebels. Furthermore, this would imply that two cars loaded with explosives managed to pass through the border gates of Turkey, which in fact turns out to be the only reasonable part of the narrative. [4]

The government officials repeatedly argued that this was the first time the Syrian civil war affected Turkish citizens. This is plain wrong, recalling the terrorist attack in Gaziantep in August 2012 killing nine [5] (successfully covered up by the government), and the Free Syrian Army militants who tried to cross the borders without passport check and get into a conflict with the security forces on May 2nd, killing one security official in Akçakale. [6]


What is actually happening?

There are two scenarios voiced by the political analysts.

First is that the Syrian regime is responsible for the attacks, menacing the Turkish government for supporting and sheltering the rebels. The aim is to put Turkey's Syrian policies into question in public opinion and therefore isolate Turkey's aggressive interventionist policies with respect to Syria. As Turkey would not get enough support from the US, who in turn is continuing its bargains with Russia, Turkey would have to converge into a more cautious position.

The second scenario is that the attack is a provocation to get Turkey involved in the conflicts in Syria. Some elements in the opposition organized the attacks to create outrage and terror in the public, resulting in a more aggressive policy with respect to Syria. The government, in search of becoming a “regional leader”, may have direct role in the attacks. If it doesn't, it would still use this opportunity with this perspective. In short, the attacks are a kind of September 11 for Turkey, a provocation to make the government take active part in the Syrian civil war. [7]

We observe that the latter scenario is swept away in mainstream media, both Turkish and international. Yet it is voiced coherently among Turkish left, and we therefore want to highlight some of its main features below.


The explosions were first reported in The Syrian Revolution 2011 website of the Free Syrian Army (FSA). The website said “Explosions in Reyhanlı. Tens of deaths.” This does not sound natural, given that Turkish news agencies were yet reporting 4 deaths at that moment.

Yet there is an important detail. Mohamad Damascian who uploaded the video to the page commented “Admin, here is the video. Take it Erdoğan. With Allah's permission, the next bomb will be in Ankara, pig!” After a while when the Turkish media and the Syrian rebels started to state that the attacks were done by the Assad regime, the video was deleted and re-uploaded without the comment.




Yiğit notes that this website consists of heterogeneous members, belonging to a variety of opposition groups. Hence, it is not straightforward to relate a post with a particular organization such as Al Nusra or FSA.

It is well known that FSA and Al Nusra have conflicts of interests, although both are supported and partially controlled by the Turkish government. After the US and France putting Al Nusra into the list of terrorist organizations, it is plausible to assume that Turkey may have put a distance, and that therefore Al Nusra is now attempting to threaten the government.

Lastly, Syrian Information Minister Umran Zubi made a press conference on Sunday and argued that “the real terrorists are Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his government”. Zubi firmly rejected any responsibility and relation to the attacks, calling the dead citizens “martyrs”. He also underlined that the Turkish government is trying create an excuse to take the support of NATO for invading Syria.


The article of Şenoğuz highlights that the Turkish state is actually standing firm in its border policies, in a semipermeable way.

The government first called the refugees “guests”, but later, when necessary, did not hesitate to send them back through the mined zone (Kilis, September 2012) or to start shooting at the borders to stop new comers due to lack of space in the camps. (Kilis, September 2012 and Akçakale, April 2013) When the tensions increased in Hatay, the city governor sent the refugees out of town. However, the government did not bother about the tensions caused by the rebels sheltered in the camps nor did it reallocate military camps to less tense regions.

Furthermore, it was reported that the security cameras on the streets were off due to a “system error”. Apparently many of the 73 security cameras were pointed directly at the explosion zones and this system error occurred a few days before the explosions. [8]

Finally, we would like to emphasize that government officials never mentioned a call for a national mournin (although RedHack organized one by hacking the website of Hatay City Governance [9]). This may be considered as a further evidence to argue for the government's intention for increased aggression.

Now we are waiting for the Erdoğan and Obama meeting, it seems only after that will we receive more news/analysis about Reyhanlı according to the needs of this strategical collaboration.


Saturday, May 11, 2013

How to Confront Police Violence


The following text is a free translation of “1 Mayıs'ta cop, gaz ve panzere karşı koyma rehberi” by Onur Erem, published in Birgün newspaper's website on April 30th, 2013. The original Turkish article aims at providing protesters with basic information on how to deal with police violence.


>> Health responsible: Being exposed to different physical attacks in protests may cause injuries, asthma crises and similar health problems. The equipment to handle such situations would slow down the protesters, and many may not be able to afford them in the first place. Therefore, choose someone in your group as responsible from health issues. This person should have with her/him basic material such as lemon, water, milk, vinegar, gauntlet and band aids. It is very important that this person does not confront the police and waits at a distance to the conflict, so that s/he is not detained with all your equipment.


>> Teargas spray / capsule: The use of teargas in demonstrations has been increasing drastically. It creates panic in the mass and scatters the protesters. Health effects include burning in the eyes, nose, skin, throat and lungs, fainting, and asthma crises. To protect your self from teargas, you must have long sleeved clothes and/or rubber raincoats on. On those parts exposed to direct air (such as your face, hands etc), it is important to put water-based sun cream. (and definitely not oil-based)


When exposed to teargas, use eye drops, water and milk to clean your eyes. To reduce the effects into minimum, cover your nose with a piece of cloth (or some cheap sterile mask you can find in pharmacies) that you submerged into lemon juice or vinegar. (Lemon and vinegar are acidic, whereas the teargas is basic. They eliminate each other.) You can apply the vinegar to all the parts of your skin that are exposed to direct air. Also, using goggles or swim masks would significantly reduce the negative effects on your eyes. This is especially important for people who use contact lenses.


Windy weather conditions reduce the effect of teargas. If you manage to take the wind to your behind, this would result in teargas going back to the police.


If the teargas was not sprayed but shot as a capsule, protect your hand with a thick cloth/glove, take the capsule and throw it back to the police. It is essential that your cloth or glove is not plastic. Plastic material can melt and stick into your hand.


Finally, it is a better idea not to take a shower before the protest. You can let your pores close by not taking a shower as long as you can before a protest. This would reduce the negative effects of teargas in your body.


>> Steel baton – stun baton: The cops may have different batons for different purposes. In addition to the classic baton that we are familiar with, there are new varieties such as the expandable baton which suddenly expands from a 15 cm stick to a 50 cm club, and the stun baton which administer an electric shock on the target. There are several ways to avoid batons. First, have put protective clothes on. You can further reduce the impact by covering your body with plastic bottles, camping mats etc., or by having life jackets on. Having protective helmets on may help as well, and not only from batons but also from teargas capsules.


Another way to protect yourself from batons is to use a shield. Lids of waste containers and many other plastic and/or metal material you can find on the street are in fact good enough to protect you from major injuries. If you are a large group, an acrylic glass board make it possible for you to block the batons, stop the cops, and even to disarm some of them by jamming them into a corner. This material (the acrylic glass, or more correctly Pleksiglas) is commonly used all around the world to protect protesters from being dispersed by the police. In order to hold it strongly, you must produce handles on your side. Instead of acrylic glass, you can also use big tractor tyres.


>> The water cannon: The acrylic glass boards and shields mentioned above can also be used to withstand the water cannons. If you don't have any of these materials, you can try to lead the water cannon into a small street by following you. Once it enters the narrow streets, the water cannon loses its maneuver possibilities. Either it takes the risk and you neutralize one watter cannon, or it doesn't and you got over it.


>> Action photographer/cameraman: It is important that several protesters take photos or video recordings in order to document illegal acts of the police. As mainstream media generally watches the situation behind the police and from a long distance, if protesters take photos during the action, many illegal practices (such as direct exposition of teargas to the face) can be documented. For those who take this responsibility, we advise to switch off face detection and similar properties, that could reduce the speed of the camera and therefore make you lose very precious seconds. Automatic focus and automatic iso modes, on the other hand, ease the work because everyone is moving. Instead of looking at the photos taken, we advise to leave it to the end of the protest, in order not to lose important scenes. If you suppose the protest to take a long time, not keeping the resolution at the highest level is a good idea so that the memory card would not be full in the middle of the protest.


Friday, May 3, 2013

4 + 4 + 4 Why “Religionization” of Public Education is Harmful – Özgür Düşünce Hareketi


Editorial note: This article, “4+4+4 Dinselleşen Eğitim Sisteminin Zararları” (Part 1 and Part 2) was written collectively by Özgür Düşünce Hareketi (Free Thought Movement) in Turkey. It makes a thorough analysis of the recent transformations in the Turkish education system. We, Out for Beyond, decided to take this opportunity to provide an account of the educational reforms, referred to as 4+4+4 in Turkey (meaning that primary education, secondary school education and high school education will take four years each). The original text is intended for the Turkish audience, we therefore shortened the text and added footnotes in the translation for the English-speaking readers.
We are thankful to Broyd who carefully went over the translation, made essential corrections, and read the proofs of the text.

Note on translation: The original article frequently uses a term, which literally translates as “religionization”.It is in fact a well-established political term in Turkey, which is used as an antonym to “secularization”. It is not the same as reshaping the education system (or the society in general) in a dogmatic, non-evidence-based way; because the process is considered as a planned introduction of religious ideology into the social and political realms. It is also not Islamization, since it encompasses many aspects (such as creationism in biology textbooks) that are not restricted to Islamic ideology. Therefore, we chose to keep the literal translation “religionization” within quotation marks.


Hundreds of topics arise under the issue of “Turkey's education problems”. The most recent of those is the new system, referred as “4+4+4”, which prescribes an education system of separate schools, each taking four years. However, in order to understand this last reform and its singularity, we must first take a broader look at the education system in large and how it operates.

It is clear that the AKP1 government pushes the education question as part of the “religionization” of the country as a whole. A combination of many factors led AKP to rise and enabled structural transformations in several items. This can be seen as AKP's desire as well as its promise. In accordance with the regional changes in the Middle East, the state paradigm must have changed too, and the arrow of change pointed against existing progress.

AKP's policies have always accorded with this wind of change. Hence, the intervention in the education sector started far earlier than the most recent reforms. Some concrete indicators are as follows: In contrast to the huge need for teachers, many unemployed teachers are put aside in the annual assignments whereas thousands of religion teachers are employed – and many of them take administrative roles in the schools. The curricula have been constantly modified in favor of creationism. The Imam Hatip High Schools2 were taken off from vocational school status. There is an increasingly common discourse of “prayer rooms for each school”. The personnel of TÜBİTAK3 were replaced according to government's ideological priorities. In the rectoral elections in the universities, the president Abdullah Gül has not complied with the election results and assigned rectors according to other political preferences.

Although AKP had the opportunity to demolish the education system in Turkey, the foundation of this transformation was laid by previous governments. The greatest damage done to Turkish education system was due to the military intervention of 12 September 1980. This coup d'etat inserted religious education into primary schools and secondary schools, a strategic step towards a more religious society. The 1982 Constitution states in Article 24 that
Education and instruction in religion and ethics shall be conducted under state supervision and control. Instruction in religious culture and moral education shall be compulsory in the curricula of primary and secondary schools. Other religious education and instruction shall be subject to the individual’s own desire, and in the case of minors, to the request of their legal representatives.”
This article not only immersed a harmful element into the formal educational curriculum but also paved the way for small children to be registered into religion courses not controlled by state authorities.

Let us now take a deep breath and ask ourselves: Why is the “religionization” of public education harmful?

It is a well known pedagogical fact that education should be given according to the cognitive and physical development of the child. With this in mind, we have a three-fold answer to our question.

1) Between ages of 6 and 11, children are capable of internalizing only concrete concepts. They can find simple solutions to simple problems, understand commands and exercise the necessary actions. What they cannot do is to contemplate abstract concepts and take actions about them.

In this period, one can talk to a child about all concrete things such as apples, toys and cars, but the child cannot make sense of concepts such as god, heaven, hell, demon and so on. Therefore, such a child would not have a healthy cognitive development because s/he would grow up in a terrifying environment where someone who watches her/him all the time, making notes of every single action and which s/he cannot see nor touch nor hear, an entity which will punish her/him for all her/his faults. The child would further grow strong guilt feelings whenever s/he does something (intentionally or unintentionally) that the religion orders her/him not to do. This would have deep psychological consequences.

After age 11, on the other hand, the child enters a critical stage in cognitive skills where s/he develops critical thinking skills. Therefore, the teaching of dogmatic, unquestionable knowledge would hinder this development.

2) Another harmful aspect of the “religionization” of education was deliberately introduced by the policy makers. The 1982 Constitution defines the religion course as “Religious Culture and Moral Knowledge”, thereby implying that morality is a concept directly linked to religion. Via compulsory religious courses, the borders of “morality” are framed and restricted by a particular sect (the Sunni interpretation) of a particular religion (Islam). This approach not only indoctrinates the unfounded claim of “no religion means no morality” but also undermines the education of morality and of religion.

3) As a direct consequence of secularism, public education should see to it that each individual is provided with the critical thinking skills that would enable her/him to reach her/his own conclusions about the world and give her/him the possibilities of self realization.

We have been observing the harmful consequences of the “religionization” of education for a long time, especially with the theory of evolution. This “spiteful of science” attitude will increase with the recently introduced religion courses. For instance, the new “Basic Religious Knowledge” course includes phrases like “the fine tuning in the universe”, “perfect human”, “intentional creation” as chapters' morals. These statements are not supported by evidence, and in fact contradict with it. The same course aims at teaching that “the aim of the creation of human is to worship Allah”. It is further clear that whenever there is conflict between the content of this course and other courses, the values and the information in the other courses will be censured.

The new education system surpasses the 1982 Constitution. Not content with the so-called “Religious Culture and Moral Knowledge” course, the system introduces “Arabic” in primary school and “Basic Religious Knowledge”, “The Holy Koran” and “The Life Of the Prophet Mohammed”, thereby teaching religious knowledge continuously. We should emphasize that by religious knowledge is meant the theological knowledge of Islam's Sunni sect.4 One example of this approach can be seen in the textbook for the course “The Life Of the Prophet Mohammed”, aimed at ninth grade students:

By linking chastity with faith, Our High Prophet states that pudicity and faith are inseparable. On this issue, he spoke 'As a matter of fact, pudicity and faith are holistically united. If one disappears, the other disappears as well.' As can be understood from this hadith, pudicity and faith are closely connected to each other. When one is nonexistent, there is a danger for the other to vanish too.”5

Yet another problem of this system is that the Koran will be read in Arabic for the course “The Holy Koran”, as in the religious courses enforced by the state, due to the ridiculous claim that the book has its own language. However, for someone to understand the Koran or any other book (independent of whether it is considered holy or not) it is essential that one reads it in a language that one is competent in and at an age when one can grasp its content. It is clear that the (elective) Arabic course would not suffice for the students to comprehend the book properly and therefore what is expected from them is that they memorize it. This is manifested publicly several times. One instance is that the 85th page of the instructor's book for “The Holy Koran” course gives hints on “some principles on how to make surah apprehension easier” where it is explained how the students can easily “memorize” those surah's. Moreover, Ömer Dinçer, the Minister of Education, confessed in an interview6 that the students “would not understand what they read”:

But the Parliament declared: The teaching of Koran and the Life of Our Prophet. We will teach it in secondary school and in high school. We will teach how to read the Koran like Turkish. After all, Arabic is an elective course. We will not teach Arabic. It is a different issue to read Koran based on the Arabic alphabet in the Arabic language. This means, the child will learn how to read a word written with Arabic letters, but the thing s/he will read will be Koran. We will create a curriculum. S/he will read but will not understand. After all, the majority of those who read the Koran do not understand it, they read it as a holy book.”

The “religionization” is not the only problem arising from the new 4+4+4 system. At first glance, we notice the following: The system lets children of age 5-5.5 enter the primary schools, when they are not physiologically ready to hold pencils nor cognitively prepared to understand and implement commands. As a consequence, primary education is now reduced, in practice, to three years. Furthermore, by fifth grade, the classes will be given by branch teachers, resulting in reallocation and unemployment of many teachers. Also, the early start to schooling without any infrastructural preparations will result in overly crowded classrooms. We would like to give some examples of complaints in order to make the point clearer.

The Education Workers' Union released a declaration7, emphasizing that the separation of primary and secondary education in a manner that is not based on pedagogical principles would imply an increase in child employment and child brides. The way is now legally cleared away for the seclusion and forced marriage of female children, as child brides are generally of age 13, 14 and 15.

According to an interview published in haber.sol.org.tr on September 21st, 2012, Ertan Uysal, the chairman of the Education Workers' Union in Tokat, made the following remark:
... while the mere existence of religious culture courses in private schools is controversial, it is a big problem to introduce forced elective courses on religion. This imposition of religious education on students who would primarily need courses such as arts, music and sports resembles the paradigm of the Middle Ages.”8

Much earlier than this interview, Hürriyet newspaper made a news item9 on the letters sent to the Ministry of Education by the parents. Here are a few items from those letters:
- I don't want my 5-year old child to get on and off the bus by himself to reach home.
- I don't want my child to be pressed by the class teacher who is forced to finish the annual curriculum.
- I don't want my 5-year old child to be open to the same risks as the students of age 12-13.
- While 7-year old children are having difficulties, I don't want my 5-year old child to start primary school.

The “religionization” of education is a big problem. When this transformation is accompanied by unhealthy, inconvenient practices, it may give rise to a social disaster. In order to prevent this, it is urgently needed to sweep away religious ideologies, not only from education but from all levels of the state affairs.

As Özgür Düşünce Hareketi, we believe that several reforms should be made.

  1. Mixed-sex education should never be questioned. The religious separation of the two genders is one of the most important causes of gender inequalities and male violence. Furthermore, children that grew up in an environment where men and women are categorically separated would have difficulties in making sense of transgender identities and would be conditioned to transphobia.
  2. Religious knowledge should be presented in the context of the history courses, under the title of history of religions and then one item being Islam. If religion teachers will be trained, they should get proper pedagogical formation.
  3. Imam Hatip Schools should be abolished, as they give the teaching of the practices of a selected religion.
  4. The so-called elective but practically compulsory religion courses should be abolished. Religious practices should not be taught to non-adults.
  5. The new regulations on the dress code that promotes the imposition of headscarves on female children should be withdrawn.


1 Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi – Justice and Development Party. The governing party in the Turkish parliament since the 2002 elections.
2Religious Vocational High Schools, that are meant to train imams but are in practice training for any profession.
3Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu – The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.
4 Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Öğretim Programları: http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72
5 Ortaöğretim “Hz. Muhammed’in Hayatı” 9. Sınıf Öğretim Materyali: http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/kitaplar/hzmuhammedinhayati_9.pdf – s. 41.
6 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/20293658.asp
7 http://www.egitimsen.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=217&sube=0#.UQZLPx3VdHJ
8 http://haber.sol.org.tr/kent-gundemleri/444-sistemi-tokatta-da-bircok-sorunla-basladi-haberi-59890
9 http://siyaset.milliyet.com.tr/tbmm-ye-4-4-4-sikayeti-yagdi/siyaset/siyasetdetay/02.04.2012/1522766/default.htm